0 results for 'Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein Brody & Agnello, P.C.'
Law Firm Ducks RICO Claim in Case Over Alleged Import Scam
A civil racketeering count has been dismissed against a Boston law firm accused of conspiring with its client on an alleged fraudulent import scheme.
Unapproved Opinions: April 23-39, 2015
Opinions not approved for publication.Aetna to Pay $120 Million To Settle Claims of Underpayment for Out-of-Network Procedures
Aetna Inc. agrees to a $120 million settlement of claims that its reliance on the database led to low reimbursements for procedures performed by out-of-network providers.
David Frank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Trilegiant Corporation, Inc., Affinion, Inc., 1-800-Flowers, Inc., and Chase Bank USA, N.A., Defendants, 10 CV 5211 (DRH) (ARL)
Publication Date: 2012-01-31 Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry: Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District Judge: District Judge Denis R. Hurley Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: By: Anthony Frank Maul, Esq., D. Brian Hufford, Esq., Jay Douglas Dean, Esq., Robert J. Axelrod, Esq., Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross, New York, NY. By: Christopher A. Seeger, Esq., Seeger Weiss, LLP, New York, NY. By: Eric D. Freed, Esq., Freed & Weiss LLC, Chicago, Illinois. By: James E. Cecchi, Esq., Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C., Roseland, NJ. By: Justin M. Klein, Esq., Marks & Klein LLP, Red Bank, NJ. For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Trilegiant Corporation, Inc. and Affinion, Inc.: By: Bernard J. Gerbutt, III, Esq., Morgan Lewis & Bockius, New York, NY. By: Gregory T. Fouts, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), Kenneth M. Kliebard, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), Chicago, Illinois. By: Richard Corey Worcester, Esq., Howrey LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys for Defendant 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.: By: Thomas J. Kavaler, Esq., Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys for Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A.: By: Andrew Arthur Ruffino, Esq., Covington & Burling, LLP, New York, NY. By: Robert D. Wick, Esq., Washington, D.C. *1 Case number: 10 CV 5211 (DRH) (ARL)
Cite as: David Frank v. Trilegiant Corporation, Inc., 10 CV 5211 (DRH) (ARL), NYLJ 1202540297802, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 24, 2012)District Judge Den
Trending Stories
- 1Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 2AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 3Future of Litigation: Keeping Pace with the Rapid Rate of Change
- 4AI/IP Issues Part 1: State of the Law and Anticipating Issues Including Licensing Concerns
- 5How Attorney Titles in Big Law Can Mean Everything, and Nothing, All at Once
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now