0 results for 'IBM'
District Judge John T. Curtin U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances For Plaintiffs: Thomas E. Stiles, Esq. Brooklyn, New York. F
GC Helps Red Hat Change the Technology World
Red Hat Inc., the world's leading open-source and Linux software provider, offers a comprehensive line of software subscriptions, services and support. Its customers include a constellation of academic and research institutions, all levels of government and a who's-who list of corporations. GC Michael Cunningham says "it is a privilege to participate in a company like Red Hat that is doing some good around the world as well as making a profit."District Judge Paul G. Gardephe U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff: Bayer Schering Pharma Ag represented by Adam K. Mortara, Bartlit Beck Herman
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Berman On or about June 12, 2003, Barbara E. Bernard ("Bernard"), on behalf of herself and others similarly sit
Apple had a lousy week in patent litigation. Not only did it lose a hefty infringement verdict to a small software company called VirnetX, but a rate-setting case against Motorola Mobility Inc. went off the rails on the eve of trial.
District Judge Arthur D. Spatt U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for the Plaintiff: By: David J. Fischer, Esq., Jennifer Dou
Critical Patent Issue in eBay Case
The stakes are high as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in a case that involves standards for injunctive relief.ARGUED DECEMBER 4, 2009Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.Rex Carr, a successful class action lawyer in southern Illinois, is locked in mortal combat with his former law partners, t
Cite as: King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, 09 Civ. 8387 (SAS), NYLJ 1202474373592, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 29, 2010)District Judge Shira A. Sch
$100,000 Software Overhaul Now May Save $30M in Damages Later
When Fish & Richardson missed a patent filing deadline for client Kairos Scientific Inc., the mistake cost $30 million. That's the dollar amount a judge placed on the error when he ordered the firm to pay damages to Kairos. According to a Fish spokesperson, the firm missed the date because someone deleted the deadline from the firm's docketing system. The case highlights the importance of meeting filing deadlines, and of docketing software.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now