Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Windels Marx Lane'

You can use to get even better search results
Akpinar v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2003-02-04
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2001-10900

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 2742f A/mv AD2d Argued - January 9, 2003 MYRIAM J. ALTMAN,

July 12, 2004 |

Castro v. NYT Television et al, etc.

The Hospital Patients Bill of Rights Act does not authorize a private cause of action for a violation of its provisions; plaintiffs' claims that defendants videotaped them without their consent while they were being treated in a hospital emergency room for use in a television show do not state causes of action for a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, commercial appropriation of their likenesses, or unjust enrichment, and the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss these claims is reversed.
12 minute read
March 08, 2012 |

New Partners Yearbook 2012

Like water seeking its own level, new partnerships rose this year to 150 — their prerecession average. It was as strong a resurgence as the earlier fall-off was precipitous.
69 minute read
November 15, 2012 |

Representing Corporate New Jersey

A chart of 145 law firms used most frequently by 37 companies.
11 minute read
Zimmerman v. Tarshis
Publication Date: 2002-12-16
Practice Area: Antitrust | Banking | Business Law | Contracts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2001?04373

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 2242f O/mv AD2d Argued ? November 4, 2002 SANDRA J. FEUERST

September 24, 2012 |

In-House at Large Public Companies

16 minute read
April 02, 2009 |

Kaufman v. Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co.

As a matter of first impression, the court considers the meaning of the significant- basis and principal-injuries provisions within the Class Action Fairness Act's local-controversy exception.
6 minute read
August 20, 2009 |

In re Adoption of N.J.A.C. 11:3-29

In re Adoption of N.J.A.C. 11:3-29, A-0344-07T3; Appellate Division; opinion by Carchman, P.J.A.D.; decided and approved for publication August 10, 2009. Before Judges Carchman, R. B. Coleman and Sabatino. On appeal from the Department of Banking and Insurance. D.D.S. No. 01-2-4933 [50 pp.}
6 minute read
November 05, 2010 |

Associates Class of 2010

It's too soon to say whether the recovery cycle has kicked in for New Jersey law firms, but our annual yearbook of new associates shows that after two years of decline, hiring is back on the upswing.
80 minute read
Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,
Publication Date: 2012-04-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Justice Loren Baily-SchiffmanBeyda v. Tawil (27590/11)—Grant Ext Short Form OrderJustice Bernadette BayneFlushing Savi

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

NEXT