Search Results

0 results for 'Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Louisiana Stadium v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 10-889-cv
Publication Date: 2010-11-29
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Cabranes and Chin, C.JJ. and Underhill, D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10-889-cv

Cite as: Louisiana Stadium v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 10-889-cv, NYLJ 1202475341391, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 22, 2010)Before: Cabran

Long Island Lighting Company v Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2005-12-08
Practice Area: Environmental Law | Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

By Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Sweeny, Catterson, JJ. 5216. Long Island Lighting Company, Plaintiff, KeySpan Corporation, etc., plf-ap, v. Allianz Underwri

Louisiana Stadium v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 10-889-cv
Publication Date: 2010-11-29
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Cabranes and Chin, C.JJ. and Underhill, D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10-889-cv

Cite as: Louisiana Stadium v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 10-889-cv, NYLJ 1202475341391, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 22, 2010)Before: Cabran

Hackney v. Chamblee
Publication Date: 2009-09-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: D.C. Ct. App.
Judge: Kramer, Associate Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08-FM-1033

Submitted May 27, 2009Before RUIZ, KRAMER and OBERLY, Associate Judges.Appellant James Hackney appeals from a Family Division order granting a Complaint for Entry of Judgment by Confession on th

Merrill Lynch Co. Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Publication Date: 2004-10-07
Practice Area: Taxation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Appeal from the July 2, 2003, decision of the United States Tax Court (Marvel, J.), holding that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue correctly assessed deficiencies in petitioner's payment of inco

Devore v Pfizer Inc.
Publication Date: 2008-11-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 4147 4147A 4147B

David B. Saxe, J.P. John W. Sweeny, Jr. James M. McGuire Dianne T. Renwick Helen E. Freedman, JJ. 4147-4147A-4147B Index 109838/06 109845/06 109847/06 Michael Devore, et al.

Beard v. Edmondson and Gallagher
Publication Date: 2002-01-25
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: D.C. Ct. App.
Judge: Glickman, Associate Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 97-CV-1985

Argued February 10, 2000Opinion for the court by Associate Judge Glickman. Concurring opinion by Associate Judge Ruiz.Edmondson and Gallagher ("E&G"), a real estate development firm, contrac

Airlines Strike Back at DOJ Merger Challenge
Publication Date: 2013-09-11
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

American Airlines and US Airways are pushing back hard against the U.S. Department of Justice, filing court papers blasting the government’s bid to block their pending $11 billion merger.

Laurence H. Rabe v. United Airlines, Inc
Publication Date: 2011-03-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 7th Cir.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-3300

SUBMITTED MAY 5, 2010"Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and COFFEY andHAMILTON, Circuit Judges.HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.This case presents issues concerning the application of United Stat

November 27, 2000 |

Activists Can't Block Citi's Purchase

Citigroup's $25 billion acquisition of Associates First Capital is getting a rough reception from community activists, but sources familiar with the transaction said federal regulators should clear the deal by year's end. It has become a battleground for activists because it is the first contested deal to be reviewed under a revised approval process that appears to exclude community reinvestment issues.
5 minute read

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT