Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Willkie Farr Gallagher'

You can use to get even better search results
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
United States of America, Appellee v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, Defendants, 98-1041L
Publication Date: 2012-11-28
Practice Area: Appeals | Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Walker, Ch.J., Winter and Cabranes, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellee United States of America: David N. Kelley and Michael J. Garcia, Assistant United States Attorneys (Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, on the brief, David Raskin, Adam B. Siegel, Jennifer G. Rodgers, James J. Benjamin, Jr., Baruch Weiss, Jamie L. Kogan, Christine H. Chung, Ira M. Feinberg, Assistant United States Attorneys, of counsel), United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Ramzi Ahmed Yousef: Bernard V. Kleinman and Steven Z. Legon, White Plains, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Eyad Ismoil: Louis R. Aidala (Joan Palermo, on the brief), New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Abdul Hakim Murad: Jerry L. Tritz (Amy J. Porter, on the brief), Law Office of Jerry L. Tritz, New York, NY.
Case number: 98-1041L

Cite as: USA v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, 98-1041L, NYLJ 1202579596394, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 4, 2003)Before: Walker, Ch.J., Winter and Cabranes, C

Tong v. S.A.C. Capital Management LLC, 100509/2007
Publication Date: 2007-06-18
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Bernard Fried
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 100509/2007

Justice Bernard J. Fried NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Filippatos PLLC (Parisis G. Filippatos, Esq.) For Defendants: Willkie Far

May 30, 2008 |

The A-List (51-200)

Lawyers like to lament the passing of their fabled past, when partners knew each other on sight, firms contented themselves to operating in one ZIP code and junior associates were not a menacing anonymous horde threatening to take out their frustrations via the blogosphere. As it happens, in the big-firm world those days aren't gone, they've just moved to the Am Law Second Hundred ranks, where firms are prosperous and growing steadily but retain the possibility of old-fashioned cohesion.
28 minute read
October 01, 2009 |

From Russia with Litigation

Legal work may be scarce in some regions, but a bear awakens in the east.
5 minute read
E L Consulting Ltd. v. Doman Industries Limited, 05-1751-cv
Publication Date: 2006-12-21
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Winter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 05-1751-cv

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT E. Christopher Murray (Megan F. Carroll, on the brief) Reisman, Peirez & Reisman, L.L.P., for Plaintiffs- Appellants. Thomas J.

In re: Adelphia Communications Corp.
Publication Date: 2005-10-06
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Scheindlin The Ad Hoc Committee of Arahova Noteholders ("Arahova Committee") requests leave to file an expedite

March 16, 2010 |

Full 1st Circuit Rules Prospectus Statements Are Not Attributable to Executives for 10(b)(5) Purposes

The 1st Circuit recently issued an en banc opinion that rejected the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's reliance on prospectus language in bringing a Rule 10(b)(5) case against broker-dealer executives. The decision overturned an earlier panel ruling upholding the SEC's use of the rule, which bars untrue statements in connection with the purchase or sale of a security. The opinion in SEC v. Tambone, on an issue of first impression, rejected "the SEC's expansive interpretation" of the rule.
4 minute read
May 31, 1999 |

Gibbons' Star Quality Dims in Delaware

8 minute read
May 12, 1999 |

Conference Raises Profile of In-House Counsel

The critical role of a company's in-house counsel was the central theme yesterday at The Corporate Lawyering Conference in New York. Sponsored by a coalition of bar associations, business councils, law firms and the U.S. Department of Commerce, the first-of-its-kind conference drew about 200 attorneys and entrepreneurs. One organizer said the conference was designed to emphasize to the business community the need for young companies to have in-house counsel.
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT