0 results for 'Kline'
AI in the Practice of Law: Response and Procedures
What does it mean to operating a law firm. Law firms operate every day on the receipt of information from investigators, from commercial institutions, opinions by experts, and memos by partners and associates, and most importantly, briefs and memoranda from opposing counsel in active litigation. Given the growing use of AI, how do the firms deal with the information received on a practical basis?People in the News—May 7, 2024—Hamburg Rubin, Pietragallo Gordon
Hamburg, Rubin, Mullin, Maxwell & Lupin announced that John F. McCaul has been elected to the board of directors for the MontCo Anti-Hunger Network (MAHN).The Estate of Kathryn Essig, Deceased v. Steven F. Essig
Phila. Court Sanctions Bosworth Over Deposition Conduct in Heated Dispute With Kline & Specter
Along with granting the motion, Judge Fletman struck Bosworth's objections to 26 questions.Phila. Judge Rejects Challenge to $977M Defective Seatbelt Verdict, Adds $33.4M in Delay Damages
"Mitsubishi Motors respectfully disagrees with the trial court's decision to uphold the verdict and intends to appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania," counsel for the defendant said in a statement.View more book results for the query "Kline "
'I Expect This Cancer to Kill Me': A Lawyer Fights for His Life
"I've never died before," said workers' compensation attorney Travis Jablonski. "I don't know how to do it—and I'd like to do it well."Even With the Local Roundup Verdict, Punitive Damages Still Aren't Packing a Punch
I have written in the past about the failure of punitive damages to have the deterrent effect they were designed to have. Rather than deter intentional harm or egregious behavior, the threat punitive damages pose is seemingly ignored by corporations and employers who put profits before preventing harm, thanks in part to awards frequently being reduced on appeal.'Clearly Inappropriate': Why This Judge Slashed $24M Off of $26.2 Crash Verdict
"While plaintiff seeks to paint an almost demonic magnitude of intent centering around 'speed' the evidence supports only that driving over the speed limit was one of the many circumstances in place at the time of the crash," ruled Judge Gwendolyn Bright of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.'Clearly Inappropriate': Why This Phila. Judge Slashed $24M Off of $26.2 Crash Verdict
"While plaintiff seeks to paint an almost demonic magnitude of intent centering around 'speed' the evidence supports only that driving over the speed limit was one of the many circumstances in place at the time of the crash," Bright ruled.'Clearly Inappropriate': Why This Judge Slashed $24M Off of $26.2 Crash Verdict
"While plaintiff seeks to paint an almost demonic magnitude of intent centering around 'speed' the evidence supports only that driving over the speed limit was one of the many circumstances in place at the time of the crash," Bright ruled.Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now