Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Putnam Investments'

You can use to get even better search results
December 02, 2013 |

Canadian Big Deals

Loblaw / Shoppers Drug Mart; Hudson's Bay / Saks Incorporated; Davis + Henderson / Harland Financial Solutions; Louisiana-Pacific / Ainsworth Lumber
9 minute read
October 30, 2013 |

Southern District

Between late 1949 and early 1951, three trials in the Southern District of New York helped instill the fear and suspicion in Americans that were the hallmarks of the Cold War era. Whether justice was done in all three cases is still being debated more than a half century later.
6 minute read
March 31, 2010 | Inside Counsel

SEC Names First Chief Compliance Officer

Kathleen Griffin joins the agency from Putnam Investments.
1 minute read
Intesa Sanpaolo, S.P.A., Plaintiff v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, et al., Defendants, 12 Civ. 2683 (RWS)
Publication Date: 2013-05-29
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Robert W. Sweet
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys For Plaintiff Intesa Sanpaolo, S.P.A.: By: Philip Z. Selendy, Jonathan E. Pickhardt, Nicholas F. Joseph, Sarah E. Trombley, Sean P. Baldwin, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys For Defendants Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank And Credit Agricole Securities (U.S.A.) Inc.: By: Lea H. Kuck, Gregory A. Litt, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Llp, New York, NY. Attorneys For Defendant The Putnam Advisory Co., LLC: By: Sean M. Murphy, Thomas A. Arena, Justin A. Alfano, Robert C. Hora, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys For Defendants Magnetar Capital LLC, Magnetar Capital Fund, LP and Magnetar Financial LLC: By: Joseph Serino, Jr., John P. Del Monaco, Nathaniel J. Kritzer, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 12 Civ. 2683 (RWS)

Cite as: Intesa Sanpaolo, S.P.A. v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, 12 Civ. 2683 (RWS), NYLJ 1202602063624, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 12, 2013)p class="

Keeler v. Putnam Fiduciary Trust Co.
Publication Date: 2001-01-23
Practice Area: discrimination
Industry:
Court: 1st Cir.
Judge: Torruella, Chief Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Rodgers, et al.
For defendant: Laura Steinberg, et al.
Case number: No. 00-1237

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. This appeal grows out of a lawsuit by Calvin Keeleragainst Putnam Investments, Inc. ("Putna

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Tax Facts on Investments 2023 Authors: Robert Bloink, Esq., LL.M., William H. Byrnes, Esq., LL.M., CWM® View this Book

View more book results for the query "Putnam Investments"

October 30, 2003 |

Complaints Filed Against Mutual Fund Co. for Alleged Market Timing

State and federal regulators took action Tuesday against Putnam Investments and two of its former investment officers in the first enforcement action against a mutual fund company for "market-timing" trading practices in mutual funds. The actions -- which do not represent criminal charges -- accuse Putnam and the two fund managers of committing civil fraud by allowing market-timing trades despite company policies that prohibit them.
4 minute read
June 17, 2004 |

Securities Litigation and Enforcement

John F.X. Peloso, senior counsel with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, and partner Ben A. Indek write that a pair of recent decisions by an SEC administrative law judge offer insight on the commission's efforts to justify not producing documents to a respondent.
11 minute read
Market Timing Claims in Class Action Against Putnam Dismissed
Publication Date: 2009-04-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

In a decision whose reasoning reminded us of the recent dismissal of auction-rate securities claims against UBS, a Maryland federal district court judge ruled that Putnam has already compensated investors allegedly harmed by mutual fund market timing via settlements with state and federal regulators.

December 10, 2004 |

The Market Roars

11 minute read
July 23, 2007 |

Mutual fund fee suits are thrown out

The legal theory that mutual fund companies gouged regular investors by charging them higher fees than institutional investors is losing ground following recent summary judgments for the mutual fund company defendants. "This is the first time that judges have concluded that plaintiffs could not make their case [after discovery]," said Ropes & Gray's Tom Skinner, who defended the financial institutions in the rejected lawsuits.
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT