Search Results

0 results for ''Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
G-New, Inc. v. Endurance Am. Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2022-09-27
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Insurance | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jennifer C. Wasson, Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Vivek Chopra, Jonathan G. Hardin, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
For defendant: Marc S. Casarino, Kennedys CMK LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael L. Zigelman, Kristina I. Duffy, Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, New York, NY; Kurt M. Heyman, Aaron M. Nelson, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott B. Schreiber, Arthur Luk, Matthew Bemis, Elliot Rosenwald, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: N21C-10-100 MMJ CCLD

The court granted a motion to dismiss in part and denied a motion to dismiss in part.

Hollywood Caf Diner, Inc. v. Jaffee
Publication Date: 2022-07-25
Practice Area: Legal Malpractice
Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging | Legal Services
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Messano
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Richard P. Coe, Jr. (Weir Greenblatt Pierce, LLP, attorneys; Richard P. Coe, Jr., on the briefs)
For defendant: Robert A. Berns (Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, attorneys; Robert A. Berns and Timothy M. Ortolani, of counsel and on the brief)
Case number: A-2272-20

Trial Court Erred in Applying Exceptional Circumstances Standard to Discovery Extension Motion after Setting Trial Date Prior to Expiration of Discovery

Appellate Division, First Department: March 15, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-03-17
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: March 15, 2022

March 11, 2022 | New Jersey Law Journal

Confidentiality Agreements, Trade Secrets and Working From Home

As businesses continue to move toward more remote work, employers should consider how to best protect their trade secrets and confidential information from misappropriation.
9 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: January 6, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-01-10
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: January 6, 2022

Appellate Division, First Department: January 4, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-01-06
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: January 4, 2022

Appellate Division, First Department: December 14, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-12-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: December 14, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department: November 18, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-11-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned Surrogate Sall
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: November 18, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department: November 16, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-11-18
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: November 16, 2021

Totta v. CCSB Fin. Corp.
Publication Date: 2021-11-02
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kevin H. Davenport, John G. Day, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Art. C. Aranilla, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, DE; Brett A. Scher, Patrick M. Kennell, Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: D69591

Motion to dismiss challenge to board election denied where motion referred to documents outside of the pleadings, requiring conversion of the motion to one for summary judgment, under which standard the court determined that further factfinding was required.

Resources

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

NEXT