Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Mcnair''

You can use to get even better search results
May 24, 2018 | Litigation Daily

Daily Dicta: Feeling Insecure

Jared Kushner has been granted a permanent security clearance—and it's an affront to every government worker and contractor held to a far stricter standard than the president's son-in-law.
7 minute read
Mays v. The State
Publication Date: 2018-05-21
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Chief Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Charles Cauble (Daniels & Cauble PC), Newnan, for appellant.
For defendant: Peter Skandalakis (Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia), Morrow; John Cranford (Coweta Judicial Circuit), Newnan, for appellee.
Case number: A18A0434

The trial court correctly concluded that it was not required, under O.C.G.A. § 17-10-1 (a) (1) (B), to include a behavioral-incentive date in defendant's 10-year sentence of probation after he pleaded guilty as a first offender to one count each of aggravated assault, misdemeanor family-violence battery and third-degree cruelty to children because defendant was not convicted of any felony offenses, as a first offender guilty plea does not constitute a conviction.

Appellate Division, Second Department: May 16, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-05-18
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: May 16, 2018

VIRGINIA L. AUGUSTA et al. v ROBERT J. KWORTNIK JR. et al.
Publication Date: 2018-05-18
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Associate Judge McCarthy
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Law Office of Sharon M. Sulimowicz, Ithaca (Sharon M. Sulimowicz of counsel)
For defendant: The Crossmore Law Office, Ithaca (Edward Y. Crossmore of counsel),
Case number: 524038

VIRGINIA L. AUGUSTA et al. v ROBERT J. KWORTNIK JR. et al.

May 18, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Should Law Firms Embrace Artificial Intelligence and R&D Labs?

There is a puzzle in the legal business. Our economic landscape is filling up with innovative organizations who have embraced the convergence of technology and business to meet new market demands, yet the legal market remains conservative.
4 minute read
Wilkerson v. The State
Publication Date: 2018-05-17
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Ellington
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Joseph Key (Miller & Key P.A.), McDonough, for appellant.
For defendant: Benjamin Coker (District Attorney), Thomaston; Brittany Fallin (Upson County District Attorney's Office), Thomaston, for appellee.
Case number: A18A0035

Defendant Who Caused Victim to Fall When He Tried to Physically Restrain Her Was Guilty of Aggravated Battery

Meadows v. The State
Publication Date: 2018-05-10
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Nahmias
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Mark Andrew Barnes, Macon; James W. Davis (James W. Davis & Associates), Macon, for appellant.
For defendant: Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Paula Khristian Smith, Christopher M. Carr (Department of Law), Karl David Cooke Jr., John Allen Regan, Dorothy Vinson Hull (Macon Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office), Macon, for appellee.
Case number: S18A0314

Trial Court Declared Mistrial Without Sufficient Factual Support and Without Considering Less Drastic Alternatives

The State v. Hudson
Publication Date: 2018-04-25
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Nahmias
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Paul L. Howard Jr., Kevin Christopher Armstrong, Lyndsey Hurst Rudder (Fulton County District Attorney's Office), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Brandon Alexander Bullard (Georgia Public Defender Council), Atlanta, for appellee. Randee J. Waldman (The Barton Juvenile Defender Clinic), Atlanta, for amicus appellee.
Case number: S17G0739

The trial court erred in reducing juvenile defendant's sentence for armed robbery because the discretion given to sentencing courts by O.C.G.A. § 49-4A-9 (e) is limited by the mandatory minimum sentence requirements of O.C.G.A. § 17-10-6.1; accordingly, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals judgment to the extent it affirmed that reduced sentence.

Hand Down List decided on: April 18, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-04-20
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: April 18, 2018

Hand Down List decided on: April 4, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-04-06
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: April 4, 2018

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources