0 results for 'Arnold & Porter LLP'
Firm Resolves Dispute in KPMG Tax Probe
California lawyer William A. Goddard and his former firm, Lee, Goddard & Duffy, have reached an agreement with federal agents who are seeking documents related to the criminal investigation of fraudulent tax shelters sold by accounting giant KPMG. The firm turned over 10,000 pages of documents, but rejected an IRS agent's request for additional information related to 24 individuals and companies, court papers say. It's unclear whether Goddard could face civil penalties or criminal charges.Report: Law Firms Losing Edge in Office Space Race
In the latest edition of its annual analysis of law firm real estate trends, real estate services firm Jones Lang LaSalle finds landlords routinely getting the upper hand in lease negotiations for the first time in seven years. At the same time, firms have been able to maintain an advantage in some major markets, including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C.Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department PETER B. SKELOS, J.P. FRED T. SANTUCCI THOMAS A. DICKERSON SHERI S.
District Judge Denny Chin U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al.: Arnold &a
Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 5497MITCHELL SIMS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT O
IBM-Lenovo Merger Under Scrutiny
IBM Corp. and China's Lenovo Group Ltd. are negotiating with federal regulators to assuage any national security concerns over their $1.7 billion deal, sources said. The Committee on Foreign Investments in the U.S., a multiagency panel that reviews acquisitions of U.S. businesses by foreign companies, is expected to decide by Friday whether to launch a formal investigation into the deal, under which Lenovo would acquire IBM's PC manufacturing business.Franchise Fee Charged Cable Provider Deemed Reasonable
In a precedent-setting ruling, a federal judge has held that the city of White Plains, N.Y., may regulate the installation of a telecommunication provider's fiber optic cable network and be compensated by the carrier for using city property to provide services to the public. The proposal of an annual 5 percent franchise fee on all revenue was deemed fair and reasonable.Cite as: US v. Robert Coplan, 10-583-cr(L), NYLJ 1202579883765, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 29, 2012)Before: Kearse, McLaughlin, and Cabranes, C
Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now