0 results for 'Gordon & Rees'
What White House Cybersecurity Strategy Means for Tech Clients: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
'The Floodgates Are Opening': 19-Lawyer Group Heads to Gordon Rees in the Northeast
"We've found in 2023 the floodgates are opening and we're seeing many great opportunities, this being one of them," Gordon Rees managing partner Dion Cominos said of the 19-attorney group addition, which also includes 11 professional staff.
'The Floodgates Are Opening': 19-Lawyer Marks O'Neill Group Heads to Gordon Rees
The group, which includes eight partners, nine associates and two of counsel, comes to Gordon Rees from Philadelphia-based insurance defense firm Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly.
Federal Judge Certifies Class in TCPA Suit Against Call Center
A federal judge in Pennsylvania has certified a class in a lawsuit alleging a nationwide call center company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991.
Malkani v. Cunningham
Publication Date: 2023-02-21 Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Health Care |
Investments and Investment Advisory |
Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Randall J. Teti, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Marcos D. Jimenez, Marcos D. Jimenez, P.A., Miami, FL for plaintiffs. For defendant: Ryan P. Newell, Lakshmi A. Muthu, Tara C. Pakrouh, Michael A. Carbonara, Jr., Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Heyden, Jr., Joseph E. Brenner, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants. Case number: 2020-1004-SG
Parties had reached valid and enforceable contract where plaintiff met his performance obligation under the contract and his request for ancillary documents was not material to the parties' agreement as plaintiff continued to perform.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition
Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Gordon & Rees"
Roberts v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N. A. et al.
Publication Date: 2023-02-21 Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle Attorneys: For plaintiff: Catherine Gibson, (The Gibson Law Firm, LLC), Atlanta, for appellant. For defendant: Jason Jackson, Denver, Elizabeth Fite, (Kutak Rock LLP), Atlanta, Jeremy Peck, (Kutak Rock LLP), Denver, Kimberly Sheridan, (Gordon & Rees, LLP), Atlanta, for appellee. Case number: A22A1689
Court vacates order dismissing an appeal because the trial court issued the order without giving the appellant notice and an opportunity for a hearing
Appellate Division, First Department: February 16, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-02-16 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:February 14, 2023
Malkani v. Cunningham
Publication Date: 2023-02-14 Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory |
Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Randall J. Teti, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Marcos D. Jimenez, Marcos D. Jimenez, P.A., Miami, FL for plaintiffs. For defendant: Ryan P. Newell, Lakshmi A. Muthu, Tara C. Pakrouh, Michael A. Carbonara, Jr., Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Heyden, Jr., Joseph E. Brenner, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants. Case number: 2020-1004-SG
Parties' written investment contract was valid and enforceable where investor did not expressly reject the contract and the parties' subsequent actions demonstrated their intent to be bound to the contract and their belief that the contract contained all material terms of their deal.
Defending Class Action Certification In Data Breach Litigation
The most common questions and key elements of a negligence claim are whether the defendant breached a duty of care, whether there is any injury as a result of the defendant's breach of any purported duty of care, and whether the defendant's alleged breach caused the plaintiff any damages. While these essential questions and elements apply with equal force in data breach litigation, the difficult question to answer in these cases is "what is the value, if any, of your injury or damages?"
A Working Parent's Case for Zoom Trials
"Using Zoom even as we come out of the pandemic is really a game changer for working parents," says Gordon & Rees Bay Area managing partner Marie Holvick.Trending Stories
- 1Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 2AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 3AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 4AI/IP Issues Part 1: State of the Law and Anticipating Issues Including Licensing Concerns
- 5Biden Picks Nominees for US District Judgeships in Pennsylvania, California and Minnesota
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now