0 results for 'Burnham Brown'
Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 10499 MICKEY LEE DILTS; RAY RIOS; and DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appella
Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 9744 LORENZO MENDOZA MARTINEZ; ELIEZER MENDOZA MARTINEZ; ELIU MENDOZA; GLORIA MARTINEZ MONTES, Plaintiffs-Appellants,p cl
Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7734 MICKEY LEE DILTS; RAY RIOS; and DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-A
Resolution Trust Corporation v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for City Savings, F.S.B., in Receivership, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND; WILLEM RIDDER;…Vandenberg v. Superior Court of Sacramento County
JOHN B. VANDENBERG et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Real Parties…Cite as: Segarra v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 13 Civ. 7173, NYLJ 1202653110209, at *1 (SDNY, Decided April 23, 2014) 13 Civ. 7173 District
Criteria for Provisional Remedies in Aid of Arbitration
In their Commercial Division Update for the New York Law Journal, George Bundy Smith, an arbitrator and mediator with JAMS, and Thomas J. Hall, a partner at Chadbourne & Parke, write: The application of equitable requirements to petitions for orders of attachment in aid of arbitration, as recent trial courts have done, raises the issue of whether a showing of irreparable harm is inconsistent with the dictates of CPLR 7502(c) that the "rendered ineffectual" test is the sole substantive ground for such relief.Criteria for Provisional Remedies in Aid of Arbitration
In their Commercial Division Update, George Bundy Smith, an arbitrator and mediator with JAMS, and Thomas J. Hall, a partner at Chadbourne & Parke, write: The application of equitable requirements to petitions for orders of attachment in aid of arbitration, as recent trial courts have done, raises the issue of whether a showing of irreparable harm is inconsistent with the dictates of CPLR 7502(c) that the "rendered ineffectual" test is the sole substantive ground for such relief.Daimler Decision Topples Longstanding New York Cases
Leslie R. Bennett, the principal of Leslie R. Bennett LLC, writes that in its recent holding that toppled a centerpiece on the subject of general jurisdiction for New York courts since 1917, the U.S. Supreme Court drastically narrowed the opportunities for asserting jurisdiction in New York, particularly over large multinational and multistate corporations and other entities.Daimler Decision Topples Longstanding New York Cases
Leslie R. Bennett, the principal of Leslie R. Bennett LLC, writes that in its recent holding that toppled a centerpiece on the subject of general jurisdiction for New York courts since 1917, the U.S. Supreme Court drastically narrowed the opportunities for asserting jurisdiction in New York, particularly over large multinational and multistate corporations and other entities.Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now