0 results for 'Grant & Eisenhofer'
The plaintiffs were granted leave to refile after their class action complaint was dismissed on Iqbal grounds, but they decided not to, in a case that raises questions about the compatibility of Iqbal and class certification.
Dissident Shareholders Up Their Demands, Fuel Legal Work
Activist and dissident shareholders, particularly hedge funds, are boosting corporate legal work as boards of directors cope with demands from sophisticated investors and proxy contests when those investors seek a board seat. The activists want changes to increase shareholder returns. And as lawyers help companies grapple with increased activism, they also expect proposed rule changes for proxy contests to heighten activist investors' leverage -- by easing board election hurdles faced by outsiders.Voices: The View from the Trenches
Litigators tell us how the recession has changed their jobs.Cite as: Berks County v. First American Corp., 08 Civ. 5654 (LAK), NYLJ 1202471663410, at *1 (SDNY, Decided August 30, 2010)District Judge Lewis A. Kaplanp
Judge Applies SLUSA Exception, Keeps Securities Class Action in State Court
$61 Million Suit Against Firm Claims Breach of Duty, Malpractice
A life insurance company that claims its $26 million investment vanished when a law firm helped a businessman loot the assets of a suburban Philadelphia company he controlled has filed a legal malpractice lawsuit that seeks $61 million in damages. The complaint contends that Duane Morris & Heckscher's simultaneous representation of both the company, Benchmark Holdings Inc., and the company's controlling shareholder, Michael T. Kennedy, led to malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty by the law firm.Two months after opting out of a class action against Pfizer, a group of major public and private institutional investors are taking matters into their own hands. On Thursday the breakaway investors and their lawyers at Bernstein Litowitz filed their own securities fraud suit, accusing Pfizer of duping shareholders about risks associated with two once-blockbuster drugs.
License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)
Notice to the bar.A federal judge in Spokane took Robbins Geller to task last month over the firm's request for $2.1 million in fees and expenses related to a $7.5 million class action settlement, questioning whether two partners should be sanctioned or referred for disciplinary proceedings for overstating their expenses. The firm apologized Tuesday but defended much of its request.
Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now