0 results for 'Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP'
RVC Floor Decor Ltd. v. Floor and Decor Outlets of Am. Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-05-04 Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Craig B. Sanders, Esq., Jonathan Mark Cader, Esq., James H. Freeman, Esq., Sanders Law Group, Uniondale, New York. For defendant: Erica Carvajal, Esq., Sanders Law LLC, Garden City, New York.
For Defendant: Bryan J. Wolin, Esq., H. Forrest Flemming, III, Esq., Robert Nathan Potter, Esq., Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, New York, New York.
Richard Charles Henn, Jr., Esq., Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. Case number: 18-CV-6449
FDO Granted Judgment on Unfair Competition Claim, Punitive Damages; Jury Is Struck
2023 Southeastern Legal Awards Honorees Announced
The honors will be presented at a gala on June 22 at Flourish Atlanta.
Atlanta's 5 Am Law 100 Firms Collectively Outpaced the National Average in Revenue
Their aggregated revenue grew by 6.25%, buoyed by a double digit increase at King & Spalding, the largest and most profitable firm with roots in the region.
'Dawn Donut Rule': A Guide for Expanding Franchises to Enforce Trademark Rights
A relatively recent trend indicates that state regulators in franchise registration states are conducting state trademark searches and advising franchise owners, who are filing applications to offer and sell franchises in those registration states, that a local third party already operates in the state under the same or similar trademark as the franchise.
RVC Floor Decor v. Floor and Decor Outlets of Am. Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-04-14 Practice Area: Trademarks
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Craig B. Sanders, Esq., Jonathan Mark Cader, Esq., James H. Freeman, Esq., Sanders Law Group, Uniondale, New York. For defendant: Erica Carvajal, Esq., Sanders Law LLC, Garden City, New York.
For Defendant: Bryan J. Wolin, Esq., H. Forrest Flemming, III, Esq., Robert Nathan Potter, Esq., Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP New York, New York.
Richard Charles Henn, Jr., Esq., Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. Case number: 18-CV-6449
Denial of Motion in Limine Based on Judicial Estoppel Is Explained
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Negotiating and Drafting Contract Boilerplate
Authors: Tina L. Stark
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP"
Gwinnett County et al. v. Netflix, Inc. et al.
Publication Date: 2023-04-12 Practice Area: Communications and Media
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals Judge: Judge Gobeil Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer Peterson, Timothy Rigsbee, Robert Ashe, (Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP), Atlanta, Steven Berezney, Garrett Broshuis, (Korein Tillery, LLC), St. Louis, for appellant. For defendant: Michael French, (Wargo, French & Singer LLP), Atlanta, Rachel Gage, Richard Robbins, (Robbins Ross Alloy Belinfante Littlefield LLC), Atlanta, Jean Pawlow, MARY Alexander, Robert Collins, Joseph Thomas, Peter Davis, (Latham & Watkins, LLP), Chicago, Gregory Garre, (Latham & Watkins, LLP), Washington, Stephen LaBriola, Ethan Knott, (Fellows LaBriola LLP), Atlanta, Victor Jih, Russell Kostelak, Eric Kohan, Kelly Yin, (Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati), Los Angeles, Michael French, (Wargo, French & Singer LLP), Atlanta, J. Walker, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, John Jett, Ava Conger, Kevin Sears, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP), Atlanta, Elba Smith, Ava Conger, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP), Dallas, Pantelis Michalopoulos, (Steptoe & Johnson, LLP), Washington, William Holley, Scott Zweigel, John Elliott, (Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, LLP), Atlanta, Matthew Friedman, Pantelis Michalopoulos, (Steptoe & Johnson, LLP), Washington, Jared Butcher, (Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP), Washington, for appellee; Holly Pierson, (Pierson Law LLC), Atlanta, Judson Turner, (Gilbert Harrell Sumerford & Martin P.C., Brunswick, for AM. Case number: A22A1172
Court affirms dismissal of a County's complaint against streaming services for payment of franchise fees under the Consumer Choice for Television Act
Kilpatrick Townsend Grew Revenue 2.6% as It Focused on Mid-Market and Tech
"Overall, we felt 2022 turned out pretty well and that we are well positioned for the future," said Kilpatrick's chair and CEO Henry Walker.
Barry v. Stryker Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-03-28 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology |
Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Andrews Attorneys: For plaintiff: Regina S.E. Murphy, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Wilmington, DE; D . Clay Holloway, Mitchell Stockwell, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA; Dario A. Machleidt, Christopher P. Damitio, Kathleen R.Geyer, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Seattle, WA; Taylor J. Pfingst, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Andrew W. Rinehart, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Winston-Salem, NC for plaintiff. For defendant: Jeremy Tigan, Brian P. Egan, Cameron P. Clark, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan G. Graves, Joseph E. Van Tassel, Cooley LLP, Reston, VA; Adam M. Pivovar, Cooley, LLP, Washington, DC; Alissa M. Wood, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Chad T. Nitta, Jason S. Jackson, Heather N Tilley, Kutak Rock, LLP, Denver, CO for defendants. Case number: D70177
The court conducted a detailed analysis of claim construction terms in a patent litigation matter concerning spinal surgeries and deformities.
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. LaMarco
Publication Date: 2023-03-23 Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY Judge: District Judge Diane Gujarati Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 17-CV-04087
Default's Entry Vacated; Corporate Entity Must Pay $862,600 Restitution, $2.58M Penalty
How Alston & Bird Helped Secure a $5M Judgment in a 20-Year, 2,000-Exhibit Case
"Our team remained focused on telling the larger story," Alston & Bird partner Amanda Waide said, weighing into the strategy behind a contract dispute case that lasted two decades.Trending Stories
- 1A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
- 2Ex-Judge Tatel Regrets Focusing Clerk Hiring on Applicants from Elite Law Schools
- 3Insights on M&A Trends: Midyear 2024 Expert Roundtable
- 4Dallas Firm That Won $45M Talc Verdict Scored Again: Jury Hits J&J With $260M
- 5It's Not Just the Spread. Big Law Is Making More 'Business-Driven' Pay Choices
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now