Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant, an Ecuadorian national who overstayed his visa, faced removal after a drug-related conviction in 1999, which followed a guilty plea that appellant entered under the advisement that it would not lead to deportation.
Plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer, Signature Flight Support, LLC, alleging wrongful termination due to his medical condition under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination.
Publication Date: 2024-05-08 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Appellate Division Judge:Per Curiam Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: A-0938-22
Plaintiff appealed a Family Part order on child custody and fees.
The court considered the consolidated report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, which recommended granting defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs' complaints for failure to provide discovery.
In a class action lawsuit, Edgar Guimaraes and Donnell Clarke, representing truckers misclassified as independent contractors, sued Metal Transportation LLC and others, including defendant Evans Delivery Company, Inc.
Plaintiff Monica Graham, after being awarded $325,000 by a jury for injuries from a car accident, appealed the judgment, arguing errors in the trial process.
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's constitutionally-based action asserting denial of its zoning application was "in furtherance of [an]improper scheme" to prevent plaintiff from operating a facility and to favor its competitors.