Filter This View

  • Mount v. Bd. of Tr., Police and Firemen's Ret. Sys.

    Publication Date: 2018-06-05
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: (A-9-16) (078021)

    The court consolidated appeals concerning two determinations of defendant board that denied two police officers' applications for accidental disability benefits.

  • Spade v. Select Comfort Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-04-23
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection | Contracts
    Industry: Retail
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lewis G. Adler (Lewis G. Adler and Law Office of Paul DePetris, attorneys; Lewis G. Adler and Paul DePetris, on the briefs); Andrew R. Wolf (The Wolf Law Firms, attorneys; Andrew R. Wolf and Henry P. Wolfe, on the briefs)
    for defendant: Andrew S. Hansen (Fox Rothschild, attorneys; Karen A. Confoy, on the brief, and Heidi A.O. Fisher and Andrew S. Hansen, of counsel and on the briefs); Brett D. Carroll (Holland & Knight, attorneys; Brett D. Carroll, Sean C. Sheely, and Duvol M. Thompson, on the briefs)
    Case Number: A-57-16 (078611)

    Inclusion of Prohibited Contractual Language Could Give Rise to Violation of Clearly Established Right or Responsibility

  • Spade v. Select Comfort Corp.

    Publication Date: 2018-04-16
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry:
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: (A-57-16) (078611)

    The court considered two questions of law certified by the Third Circuit, arising from putative class actions brought under the TCCWNA concerning sales and delivery of furniture, which alleged violations of regulations promulgated by the New Jersey Attorney General under the CFA.

  • Ardan v. Bd. of Review, Dept. of Labor and Workforce Dev.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-19
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Labor Law
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sarah S. Hymowitz (Legal Services of New Jersey, attorney; Sarah S. Hymowitz, Keith Talbot, Anisa Rahim, and Melville D. Miller, on the briefs)
    for defendant: Christopher J. Hamner, Deputy Attorney General (Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney; Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel, and Robert M. Strang, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief); Cindy M. Perr, Associate General Counsel (Lourdes Health System, attorney; Cindy M. Perr, on the brief)
    Case Number: A-35-16 (077771)

    Employee Not Required to Demonstrate Disability Notice-and-Inquiry to Employer for Eligibility for Unemployment Compensation Benefits

  • Ardan v. Bd. of Review, Dept. of Labor and Workforce Dev.

    Publication Date: 2018-02-01
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation | Labor Law
    Industry:
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: (A-35-16) (077771)

    Plaintiff appealed from the appellate division's denial of her application for unemployment benefits.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New York Attorney Discipline: Practice and Procedure 2024

    Authors: Hal R. Lieberman, J. Richard Supple, Jr., Harvey Prager

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Bisbing v. Bisbing

    Publication Date: 2017-12-18
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: FOR APPELLANT: Paul H. Townsend (Townsend, Tomaio & Newmark, attorneys; Paul H. Townsend, of counsel and on the brief; Valerie R. Wane, on the brief)
    for defendant: FOR RESPONDENT: Matheu D. Nunn (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito & Frost, attorneys)
    Case Number: A-2-16 (077533)

    Trial Court Should Have Conducted Best Interest Analysis to Determine Cause in Contested Relocation Disputes