It is indisputable that mediation and arbitration are economical and sensible alternatives to resolving cases that do not fit well into the traditional adversarial court model. The court system tracks cases filed and the time and type of disposition in almost excruciating detail. It cannot, of course, track cases that go to ADR pre-litigation. Why do we know that pre-litigation ADR is a successful tactic?
First, the economics are obvious. There are costs inherent in litigation. Preparation of a complaint, filing fees and service-of-process fees are the obvious.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
