The date when the statute of limitations begins to run has increasingly become a highly contested issue in demands for contribution under §113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). Recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) weighed in on this issue, submitting amicus briefs to the Sixth and Seventh Circuits, arguing that a bright-line rule should be implemented so the statute of limitations begins to run for a §113(f)(3)(B) contribution claim from the effective date of the Administrative Order on Consent (AOC). In both the Sixth and Seventh Circuits, the USEPA is taking an adverse position to settling parties that accepted cleanup obligations at Superfund sites.

The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) of CERCLA created two distinct rights to contribution under 42 U.S.C. §9613(f)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]