The sole defendant at trial is not entitled to a credit against any verdict returned against him in an amount equivalent to the aggregate for which the other named defendants settled prior to trial.
September 12, 2013 at 03:05 PM
1 minute read
Graham v. Mehta, L-1087-09; Law Division, Middlesex County; opinion by Rea, J.S.C.; decided June 5, 2013; approved for publication September 10, 2013. DDS No. 29-3-1294 [5 pp.]
The issue presented in this medical negligence case is whether the sole defendant at trial, Dr. Nehal Mehta, would be entitled to a credit against any verdict returned against him in an amount equivalent to the aggregate for which the other named defendants settled prior to the commencement of trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Philadelphia Plaintiff litigation firm seeks an associate attorney with at least 2 years' experience to join our team handling personal inju...
Position OverviewThe United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is accepting applications for the full-time, permanent positio...
A prominent AV-rated Education Law firm seeks an associate with 5+ years experience. The role will primarily involve advice and counsel in ...
