The sole defendant at trial is not entitled to a credit against any verdict returned against him in an amount equivalent to the aggregate for which the other named defendants settled prior to trial.
September 12, 2013 at 03:05 PM
1 minute read
Graham v. Mehta, L-1087-09; Law Division, Middlesex County; opinion by Rea, J.S.C.; decided June 5, 2013; approved for publication September 10, 2013. DDS No. 29-3-1294 [5 pp.]
The issue presented in this medical negligence case is whether the sole defendant at trial, Dr. Nehal Mehta, would be entitled to a credit against any verdict returned against him in an amount equivalent to the aggregate for which the other named defendants settled prior to the commencement of trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
New York boutique law firm currently seeking an attorney with substantive knowledge and at least three years experience litigating in New Yo...
LOGS Legal Group LLP is looking to add a Managing Attorney to our Cincinnati, Ohio office. JOB TITLE: Managing Attorney BUSINESS UNIT: Le...
Capehart Scatchard seeks a personal injury defense litigation associate with 1-4 years experience. Hybrid remote work permitted. Must be ad...
