A woman injured on a raft ride at Six Flags Great Adventure has no cause of action against the Jackson amusement park, a state appeals court rules, finding the plaintiff's exclusive remedy was under the Product Liability Act, which she failed to establish.
May 30, 2013 at 02:23 AM
1 minute read
A woman injured on a raft ride at Six Flags Great Adventure has no cause of action against the Jackson amusement park, a state appeals court found on Tuesday.
The Appellate Division affirmed dismissal of Morgan v. Six Flags Great Adventure, A-2547-11, on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy was under the Product Liability Act, which she failed to establish.
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
