The finding of abuse and neglect under Title 9 based solely on an expectant mother's drug use cannot be sustained where there is no evidence of actual harm when the baby is born.
February 06, 2013 at 05:51 AM
1 minute read
DYFS v. A.L., A-28 September Term 2011; Supreme Court; opinion by Rabner, C.J.; decided February 6, 2013. On certification to the Appellate Division. DDS No. 20-1-8937 [44 pp.]
In this appeal, the court determines whether a court can find "abuse" or "neglect" of a child under Title 9 if an expectant mother uses drugs during pregnancy but there is no evidence of actual harm when the baby is born.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
