A state appeals court on Tuesday upheld a $1 million default judgment against a lawyer who failed to lodge a timely challenge to a bank's collection suit, finding no excusable neglect.
October 25, 2011 at 06:32 PM
1 minute read
A state appeals court on Tuesday upheld a $1 million default judgment against a lawyer who failed to lodge a timely challenge to a bank’s collection suit.
There was no excusable neglect in Douglas Hanna’s not filing an answer, nor was there merit in his belated attempts to challenge the bank’s standing to sue, the Appellate Division said in TD Bank, N.A. v. 1928 Highway 35, L.L.C., A-2834-10.
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
