Despite the state Supreme Court’s general approbation of a party’s ability to sue for legal malpractice even after accepting a settlement, there are cases where the courthouse door may still be closed.
One such case, decided Wednesday, is Gere v. Louis, A-0661-08, in which the Appellate Division found that the plaintiff’s dissatisfaction with an earlier settlement in a matrimonial action was offset by a second one that she deemed fair and reasonable.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
