The long-controversial practice of putting new judges on the family court bench — which a state chief justice vowed two decades ago to discontinue — shows no sign of abating.
The judiciary’s latest general assignment order, seating the state’s judges for the 2010-11 court year, situates 14, or 58 percent, of the 24 judges newly appointed this year in the Family Part.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
