In oral arguments before the New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday, the justices weighed whether the refund provision created under the “Truth in Menu Act” was intended to apply only to violations involving food or to all claims of any kind brought under the Consumer Fraud Act.

A lawsuit, originally brought in 2013, was filed against five retirement communities in New Jersey—Springpoint at Monroe Village, Springpoint at Montgomery, Springpoint at Crestwood, Springpoint at Meadow Lakes and Springpoint at the Atrium.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]