Just over one year ago, after the trial courts, in three cases consolidated on appeal, denied plaintiffs’ requests to have a third party accompany them during a defense medical examination (DME), the Appellate Division set forth six guidelines for third parties attending and recording DMEs. Difiore v. Pezic, 472 N.J. Super. 100 (App. Div. 2022).

Specifically, Judge Jack Sabatino provided that:

  1. There is no absolute prohibition or entitlement to a DME; each request must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
  2. Plaintiff has the burden to justify that a third party’s presence or recording is appropriate.
  3. Any recording may be done via a fixed camera, which includes a cellphone on a tripod.
  4. Any information obtained can be used only for the purpose of the case and not otherwise disclosed.
  5. Any third party observer cannot interfere with the examination.
  6. If an interpreter is needed, the interpreter must be neutral.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]