Marijuana activist Ed Forchion, who calls himself NJ Weedman, at his restaurant NJ Weedman’s Joint in Trenton, New Jersey, U.S., on Friday, Feb. 12, 2021. Photo: Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg
The New Jersey Appellate Division upheld the dismissal of a marijuana activist’s legal malpractice and emotional distress claims against his former attorney, finding that his expert’s report ignored pertinent facts and that he produced no medical documentation.
Edward Forchion, one of the named defendants in the case, identifies himself as a “well-known activist for the legalization of marijuana” and is known as the “New Jersey Weedman,” according to the opinion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
