The outlook is uncertain for a suit claiming pelvic mesh users paid excessive legal fees in multidistrict litigation, after the New Jersey Supreme Court declined to provide guidance in a choice-of-law dispute.

The Supreme Court denied a request from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for guidance on whether Texas or New Jersey contingency rules should apply to suits filed in a New Jersey court on behalf of lawyers from Texas.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]