Suit Claiming Failure to Detect Tumor Yields $2.1 Million Verdict in Union County
A jury in a medical malpractice case, Leone v. Bauman, on Sept. 18 awarded $2.1 million to a man whose face was disfigured after his dentist failed…
November 01, 2019 at 02:02 PM
4 minute read
A jury in a medical malpractice case, Leone v. Bauman, on Sept. 18 awarded $2.1 million to a man whose face was disfigured after his dentist failed to diagnose a cancerous tumor in his jaw, though the plaintiff's recovery was reduced to $1.53 million.
Plaintiff Anthony Leone, a dental patient, charged that Dr. Lawrence Bauman, his longtime dentist, failed to diagnose oral squamous cell carcinoma, resulting in extensive surgery to his face to remove the lesion. The malpractice occurred at a visit in May 2014, according to Leone's attorney, Jack Wurgaft of Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins in Springfield.
The case was heard in Union County Superior Court before Judge Robert J. Mega. The jury, after a three-week trial, returned a verdict of $2.1 million, which was reduced based on a preexisting cancerous condition as required by Scafidi. That reduced the net verdict to $1.53 million.
Medical Protective, based in Princeton, is the insurance carrier covering the entire settlement.
David Lustbader of Lustbader & Lustbader in Livingston represented Bauman. Lustbader couldn't be reached for comment.
Leone claimed Bauman failed to conduct a proper oral examinations on him, and thus didn't detect the cancerous tumor in a timely fashion.
At trial, Leone presented testimony of the treating head and neck surgeon who performed extensive surgery to remove the tumor, as well as testimony from a certified dentist and oral pathologist, who testified that the cancerous lesion was diagnosable at a point in time, and the surgery, chemotherapy and radiation would not have been necessary if it were detected, according to Wurgaft.
The surgery required removing half of Leone's face, identifying and removing the cancerous tumor, and reconstructing his jaw using bone and soft tissue from his lower leg, Wurgaft said, noting that no settlement offer was made.
Wurgaft said it is the largest known dental malpractice verdict in Union County. "The verdict was fair considering the injuries were substantial and life-threatening," he said in a phone call.
Leone, now 56 and living in Warren, owns his own home construction business. Wurgaft said his life has changed dramatically.
"He has substantial limitations," Wurgaft said. "His face is disfigured and [he] has difficulty eating, drinking and swallowing. And of course, he has the anxiety of whether the cancer will come back."
— Suzette Parmley
|$1.1M Settlement in Optometry Case
Mutz v. Offen: A Union County couple settled their medical malpractice case against their optometrist for $1.1 million on Aug. 21.
Plaintiffs Rita and Donald Mutz of Westfield settled their medical malpractice case against optometrist Suzanne Offen of Offen Eye Associates in Westfield.
The release was filed on Sept. 3, 2019 in Union County Superior Court.
Plaintiff Rita Mutz, 67, and a retiree at the time of treatment, complained of spotty vision in her left eye with white cloud effect which had started a few days earlier to Dr. Offen on July 21, 2017.
No intraocular pressure was measured and no gonioscopy was performed, according to the case. Mutz was dilated and a diagnosis of vitreous degeneration was made, according to court documents.
Mutz was rechecked on July 27, 2017, with intraocular pressure elevated at 60 in the left eye. Conjunctive hemorrhage in her left eye was diagnosed, according to the complaint.
Two days later, she paid an emergency visit to a retina specialist and was diagnosed with severe corneal haze, stromal edema and microcystic edema in the left eye.
Mutz was represented by Bruce Nagel of Nagel Rice in Roseland. Susan F. Connors, also of Nagel Rice, was co-counsel with Nagel.
Robert T. Evers of Marshall Dennehy Warner Coleman & Goggin in Roseland represented Dr. Offen. Evers had no comment.
Nagel said Mutz lost vision in her left eye due to optic atrophy and Dr. Offen's missed diagnosis of acute angle glaucoma. Mutz claimed the eye exams were incomplete and should have included modalities to test for infection.
Nagel said the case never went to trial and his team settled directly with the defendant.
Travelers Insurance is covering the entire settlement.
"$1.1 million is a fair number for the general loss of vision in one eye," Nagel said. "She can function but she lost vision in one eye."
— Suzette Parmley
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 3Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 4In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 5Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250