A state law restricting arbitration agreements in employment contracts in the wake of the #MeToo movement is facing a challenge in federal court.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute claim in their suit that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.7, which was signed into law in March. The New Jersey law deems unenforceable any employment contract “that waives any substantive or procedural right or remedy relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment,” and also provides that “no right or remedy under the Law Against Discrimination or any other statute or case law may be prospectively waived.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]