A state appellate court, ruling in favor of a Newark man who slipped at a nonprofit drug rehabilitation facility where he was living, said the facility’s level of private contributions ”seems too nominal” for it to be entitled to charitable immunity.

Monday’s published decision was the second time in the case, F.K. v. Integrity House, that the Appellate Division reversed a lower court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendant, Integrity House Inc. of Newark.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]