Companies have historically used their patent rights to restrict the unauthorized resale of products in secondary markets. Manufacturers and distributors were able to control downstream sales of their products to third parties by enforcement of their patent rights. The patent rights were particularly useful in restricting unauthorized U.S. resale of products that were originally sold overseas at reduced prices. However, a recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court found that the sale of a patented product in the United States or abroad exhausted all patent rights in the product and thus, eliminated patent rights as a tool to control downstream resale of the product.
Background
In Impression Products v. Lexmark Int’l, 137 S. Ct. 1523 (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether Lexmark’s sale, both in the United States and abroad, of printer cartridges exhausted its patents rights in the cartridges such that Impression Products could freely refurbish, resell and/or import the Lexmark cartridges.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
