In recent years it has at times felt as though the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) has expanded at a rate rivaling that of the universe. Recent published and unpublished holdings, however, have shown an increasing willingness at the appellate level to contract this expansion. Such decisions have been grounded both in common sense and in a strict reading of the OPRA statute itself.
Since its enactment in 2002 the OPRA statute has remained largely unchanged, while judicial application and analysis has waxed and waned regarding striking the appropriate balance of governmental transparency. Whether this recent apparent contraction of OPRA analysis will prove to be the start of a sea-change or merely a blip on the timeline will likely be determined by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and whether our justices will reverse or affirm pending cases such as Paff v. Galloway Township, 444 N.J. Super. 495 (App. Div. 2016), cert. grant., (pending) 227 N.J. 24 (2016), and North Jersey Media Group v. Township of Lyndhurst, 441 N.J. Super. 70 (2015), cert. grant., (pending) 223 N.J. 553 (2017)
Release of Personal Information
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
