A federal judge in Newark has denied challenges from plaintiffs’ and defense attorneys to expert witnesses who are offering opinion evidence on methods to verify individual claims and calculate damages in claims over alleged mislabeling of orange juice.
In the 5-year-old multidistrict litigation claiming Tropicana misled customers with the slogan “100 percent pure and natural” on its label, plaintiffs’ experts offered novel theories on how to determine whether each claimant actually purchased the product and how much they were damaged by the company’s alleged practices of adding natural flavoring to the juice and storing it for up to one year before selling it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
