In L.M.L. v. H.T.N. (Supreme Court, Monroe Co., NYLJ, 10-20-17) Justice Richard A. Dollinger grappled with an application for interim exclusive possession of the marital residence. With the literary flair so often found in a Dollinger decision, he styled his task “an Augean Challenge,” analogizing it to the Fifth Labor of Hercules. (For the fifth labor, Eurystheus ordered Hercules to clean up King Augeas’ stables wherein some 30 years of cattle dung had accumulated, a foul and sordid task indeed. No doubt many a matrimonial judge, wading daily through the muck of failed marriages, has felt similarly oppressed.) It is an apt analogy. The resulting decision substantially recasts one of the traditional standards governing the grant of such relief. The decision is both instructive and innovative. It is also troubling. This article will explore its substantive and procedural implications.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com