The Internal Revenue Service recently issued Revenue Procedure 2002-22, providing ruling guidelines for the tax classification of undivided fractional interests in rental real property. Although we continue to find clients to whom this comes as a surprise, section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code prominently provides that the tax-free treatment accorded to like-kind exchanges does not apply to the exchange of partnership interests. Therefore, partnership interests cannot constitute either relinquished property or replacement property in a like-kind exchange.

When confronted with this obstacle, real estate lawyers sometimes propose restructuring the partnership into a tenancy-in-common. For example, a taxpayer who transfers real property in a like-kind exchange may replace it with a 50 percent tenancy-in-common interest in a building, since the tenancy-in-common interest constitutes real property. Then, the tax lawyers “who always foul-up the deal” point out that for tax purposes a tenancy-in-common is often treated as a partnership, resulting in a disqualified exchange.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]