X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In this tax lien foreclosure matter, the issue of the distribution of the surplus funds after the foreclosure sale of the subject property is before this court. The two claimants to the Surplus Monies are defendants DANNY Z, LLC (“DANNY Z”) and The Public Administrator of Bronx County (“Public Administrator”), as Administrator to the Estate of LUCILLE HERCULES BARROW (“the Decedent”). On August 1, 2016, the Tax Lien affecting the underlying property was auctioned and sold to the highest bidder for $360,000.00. On January 18, 2017, Robert Moll, Esq., as Referee, filed the Referee Report of Sale indicating that as a result of the sale of the underlying property, minus administrative and other related expenses, there was a surplus of $276,101.78. On February 1, 2017, the NYC Department of Finance (“NYC DOF”) issued a receipt acknowledging having received, from the Supreme Court — Bronx County Clerk’s Office, Surplus Monies in the amount of $276,101.78. The Abandoned Property Law requires NYC DOF to pay funds to The Office of the State Comptroller (“OSC”) after three years (APL §600(1)[a]). As the three-year period had elapsed, NYC DOF was obligated to pay the funds to OSC. On April 5, 2021, the NYC DOF paid $285,202.40 to OSC. On April 15, 2021 this Court issued an Order disaffirming the Referee, Deidre R. Moore, Esq.’s Report of August 14, 2019 wherein she recommended that the surplus funds be turned over to the Public Administrator. This Court found that the claimant, DANNY Z established that it received a deed from the only known heir, Yvonne Hercules Barrow, and found that DANNY Z was entitled to all surplus funds. On June 15, 2021, the Court issued an Order directing the Bronx County Treasurer to disburse the funds. Unbeknownst to the Court and DANNY Z, the surplus funds were no longer being held by the Bronx County Treasurer and were in the custody of the OSC. On February 15, 2022, this Court issued an Amended Order directing OSC to disburse the funds to DANNY Z. The Amended Order did not include consideration of the OSC papers in opposition thereto. The OSC, as custodians of the surplus funds, now moves to vacate pursuant to CPLR 5015, Orders dated April 15, 2021 and June 15, 2021 and Amended Order dated February 15, 2022; and/or Renew pursuant to CPLR 2221(e); and/or Remove pursuant to CPLR 325 (e). In this action, the Referee and Public Administrator challenged the status of Yvonne Hercules Barrow as being the sole heir of Decedent. In support of their challenge to Yvonne Hercules Barrow’s purported status as the sole heir, the Referee noted in her August 14, 2019 report that the Decedent’s death certificate showed that at the time of her demise, Decedent was married/separated. This Court agrees with the OSC that once the Referee and Public Administrator identified information showing Decedent was survived by a spouse, a determination should have been made to determine the existence of a surviving spouse and other possible heirs. It should be noted that, contrary to DANNY Z’s opposition, the affidavit of Yvonne Hercules Barrow does not sufficiently establish whether there are any other heirs to the estate of the Decedent or her son, James Samuel Hercules. The Supreme Court and the Surrogate’s Court have concurrent jurisdiction over the administration of a decedent’s estate (see Goodwin v. Rice, 79 AD3d 699, 699-700 [2010]). “However, ‘[w]herever possible, all litigation involving the property and funds of a decedent’s estate should be disposed of in the Surrogate’s Court’ ” (Cipo v. Van Blerkom, 28 AD3d 602 [2006], quoting Nichols v. Kruger, 113 AD2d 878, 878-879 [1985]). In this action, the non-party DANNY Z seeks to recover funds of an estate. As such, determination of this action “affects the administration of a decedent’s estate” (CPLR 325 [e]). Accordingly, this Court is exercising its power under article VI, §19 (a) of the New York Constitution to grant the movant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 325 (e) to remove this action to the Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this Court’s Orders dated April 15, 2021 and June 15, 2021 and Amended Order dated February 15, 2022 are hereby vacated; and it is further ORDERED that the Referee’s report dated August 14, 2019 is affirmed and the OSC is directed to disburse the Referee’s fee of twelve thousand three hundred dollars ($12,300.00) and the balance to the Public Administrator as Administrator of Decedent’s estate; and it is further ORDERED that this action is removed to the Surrogates Court, Bronx County; and it is further ORDERED that the Bronx County Public Administrator serve a copy of this Order upon the parties participating in the instant motion, and to the Clerk of the Bronx Supreme Court who shall, upon such service, transfer to the Bronx Surrogates Court all of the papers heretofore filed in said action. This is the Decision and Order of the Court. Dated: April 20, 2022

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More
May 15, 2024
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...


Apply Now ›

Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›