Appellate Division Second Department Motion List released on: December 8, 2017 By Dillon, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.

PEOPLE, etc., res, v. John Howell, ap — (S.C.I. No. 1037N/14) — Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered October 22, 2014, which was held in abeyance pending further proceedings in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, on his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, by decision and order of this Court dated January 25, 2017, and for leave to serve and file a supplemental brief in connection with the appeal.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to reargue is denied as academic; and it is further,ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to serve and file a pro se supplemental brief is denied.DILLON, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.Onewest Bank, FSB, ap, v. Michael McKay a/k/a Michael C. McKay, res, et al., def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Town of Warwick, plf-res, et al., plf, v. Black Bear Campgrounds defendants-respondents defendants; Giroa Neeman intervenor-ap — Application by the defendants-respondents Black Bear Campgrounds, Black Bear, and Howard Smith, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated January 25, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 4, 2018, and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Jesus Arevalo, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 5, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered July 11, 2016Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee in trust for the benefit of the certificateholders for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Trust 2005-R10, etc., ap, v. Arthur Lewis, II, a/k/a Arthur S. Lewis respondents def — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 22, 2018, to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 14, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied. .By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Sofia A. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-appellant; Rubia A. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated September 12, 2017. By order to show cause dated October 10, 2017, the parties were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding on the ground that the appeal had been rendered academic.Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, it isORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.Janine Lawlor ap, v. Torchmark Corporation res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.John Creutzberger, res, v. County of Suffolk ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Luciano Bonanni res-ap, v. Horizons Investors Corp., appellants-res, et al., def — Application by the appellants-respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, enteredMay 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellants-respondents’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 6, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellants-respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondents-appellants shall serve and file their answering brief, including their points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3].Chase Home Finance, LLC, res, v. George Votino, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 10, 2017 and January 11, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until February 1, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Tahseen Meraj res, v. Walgreens Co. defendants-third-party- plaintiffs-appellants defendants; third party def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 31, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Tara Bohan, ap, v. Paul DeLucia, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Robert Fidler, ap, v. Gordon-Herricks Corp. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 21, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 6, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Dave Shostack, ap, v. Cory Lewkowitz, et al., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Roberto Alayon, res, v. MTA Bus Company, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Harinder Singh ap, v. Gurdev Singh Kang respondents- respondents nominal res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 23, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Joseph Hershkowitz, ap, v. Wesley Hills Center, LLC, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 90-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated May 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 31, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Surender Gorunkati, etc., individually and on behalf of Richmond Medical Diagnostic, P.C., appellant-res, v. Baker Sanders, LLC, formerly known as Baker, Sanders, Barshay, etc., res-ap, Asta Funding, Inc. res — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).MATTER of Nella Manko, ap, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal Office of Rent Administration, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 2017, February 3, 2017, and December 23, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Ernie John, ap, v. William Levinson, def, Porsche Leasing, Ltd., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Achwad Bakth, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC Bank, USA, National Association, as trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-ARI, res, v. Arlene Gilbert ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until February 15, 2018, to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Sylvia Santiago, ap, v. New York City Housing Authority, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee for the registered holders of Park Place Securities, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-WCW1, res, v. Doron Eitani def, David Cohan, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 18, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Parviz Noghrey, ap, v. Town of Brookhaven res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 13, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Thomas Barr IV, ap, v. The Attorney General of the State of New York res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until March 21, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Erika Singer, pet, v. Theresa L. Egan, etc. res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until January 5, 2018, to serve and file a brief in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 which was transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Beverley Walker, res, v. Ian M. Miner, ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 4, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 8, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.Transportation Insurance Company, res, v. Main Street America Assurance Company, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 120-day enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, the application is otherwise denied, and it is further,ORDERED that on the Court’s own motion, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.PEOPLE, ap, v. Richard Johnson, res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from an order and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 21, 2017 and May 9, 2017, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 8, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Nyasha Williams res, v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County dated June 2, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Hyon Chu Kim, ap, v. Anthony Denicker res — Application by the respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 18, 2018, the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Citimortgage, Inc., res, v. Victor A. Osorio ap — , et al., def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated October 31, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 4, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Palero Food Corp., doing business as Fine Fare Super Market ap, v. Howard A. Zucker, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, et al., res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Leading Insurance Group Insurance Company, Ltd. ap, v. Utica First Insurance Company, res — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 30, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Robert Castillo, ap, v. Srikrishna Surasi, etc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 10, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 24, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.GHI Marketing, Inc., doing business as AIA Imprint Experts, res, v. Charles Diven, et al., def, Navajo Fields, Inc., doing business as Navajo Sports Complex, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 29, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Lenora Kinchen, ap, v. Alexandra Piscionere, as Director of Investigations, General Counsel, etc., et al., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 6, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 3, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Laura Flores, ap, v. Westchester County Bee Line respondents def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 24, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.L.A. Wenger Contracting Co., Inc., ap, v. Wendy Wenger, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated April 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 17, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA), res, v. Kazi A. Hossain, etc. def, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 23, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Leon Abehsera, ap, v. Joseph Saldin, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 26, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Anthony Torres, ap, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, et al., res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 14, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Durwin Q. Joseph, res, v. Shuttle Associates, LLC appellants-res, Alberto A. Zephryne, Sr., res-res — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal and a cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellants-respondents’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 24, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeal and cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellants-respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-14, res, v. Suanny Joo appellants def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 6-month enlargement of time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.Gladys Espeleta, res, v. Synergy Resources, Inc., ap — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 15, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 10, 2018, the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Deshawn R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Duchesne R. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Duchnah R. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Duchesne R. (Anonymous), respondent- appellant res — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Duchesne R. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 15, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 27, 2017.MATTER of Michael Burrell, Sr., respondent v. Heather West Burrell, ap — V-8085-08/16Q, V-8086-08/16M) — Appeals by Heather West Burrell from two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, both dated February 2, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 30, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.MATTER of Symphani F. G. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Otis G. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — Appeals by Otis G. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 17, 2016, and May 30, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until January 2, 2018.MATTER of Susan M. Greco, ap, v. Robert N. Greco, res — Appeal by Susan M. Greco from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated May 17, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on November 30, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.MATTER of Suzanne Greenwald, ap, v. Brian Greenwald, respondent-appellant — Appeal by Suzanne Greenwald, and cross appeal by Brian Greenwald, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated August 24, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that Suzanne Greenwald shall perfect the appeal in the above-entitled proceeding within 60 days after the receipt of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , Suzanne Greenwald shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal and cross appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has beentaken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal and cross appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Pedro Pena, res, v. Rosa Tiburcio, ap — Appeal by Rosa Tiburcio from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated May 6, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 5, 2018.  MATTER of Lisa A. Robinson-Pickett, res, v. Yusef Sirius-El, ap — Appeal by Yusef Sirius-El from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 15, 2016. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 15, 2017.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Indiray Y. Delacruz, ap, v. Marcel Ho, res — Appeal by Indiray Y. Delacruz from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated November 9, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreement relating to IMPAC Secured Assets Corp., etc., res, v. Althea Windsor, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Golden Eagle Capital Corp., plf-res, v. Paramount Management Corp defendants- res, Louis & Sons, Inc., appellant def — Application by the plaintiff-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 23, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the plaintiff-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 17, 2018, and the plaintiff-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Linda S. M. (Anonymous), appellant pet, v. Demetrius W. (Anonymous) res — V-18752-15, V-18753-15, V-18761-15) — Appeal by Linda S. M. from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 7, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the attorney for the children to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 3, 2018.455 Dumont Associates, LLC, ap, v. Rule Realty Corp., res — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve an file a brief on an appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Silvana Tardi, as executrix of the estate of Angela Moraca, res-ap, v. Anthony G. Saleh, etc., appellant- respondent def — Application pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 2017, and a judgment of the same court dated July 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the appellant-respondent’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until March 14, 2018, and the joint record or appendix on the appeals and cross appeals (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][1]) and the appellant-respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that the respondent-appellant shall serve and file the answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeals, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]).Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., res, v. Brian Zweifler, a/k/a Brian D. Zweifler, appellant def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, both dated April 27, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 30, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, successor in interest by purchase from the FDIC as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, formerly known as Washington Mutual Bank, FA, res, v. Patricia Bradley, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated December 21, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Jacqueline Charlery, plf-res, v. Allied Transit Corp. ap, Douglas J. Fecht, def-res — Separate applications by the plaintiff-respondent and defendant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective briefs on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file their respective briefs is enlarged until January 19, 2018, and the applicants’ briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.Deutsche Bank, res, v. Moustafa Elshiekh appellants def — Application by the respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 10, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 27, 2017, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Angela-Marie C. (Anonymous). Westchester Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Renee C. (Anonymous), res-res — Appeal by Renee C. from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County, dated April 4, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeal to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 12, 2018.One West Bank, res, v. Jerry Schiffman ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 4, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wachovia Mortgage World Savings Bank, res, v. Marvin Odums, III, a/k/a Marvin Odums, ap, et al., def — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 5, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.The Bank of New York Mellon, res, v. Felix M. Carcano ap, et al., def — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Robert P. Bilboa ap, v. The City of New York res — Application by the respondent The Dominick Grisanzio Irrevocable Trust by its trustees Maria Oliveri and Frank Grisanzio pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 5, 2018, and the applicant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.ORDER ON APPLICATION N. M. M., etc., ap, v. Tatyana Kotlyarevsky, etc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 8, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 2, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of The Law Offices of Frank DeSousa, ap, v. Nassau County respondents- respondents res — Application by the respondents-respondents pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 3, 2018, and the applicants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Wells Fargo, N.A., plf-res, v. Michele Brown, a/k/a Michele A. Brown def-ap, First Deposit National Bank defendants-res, 497 Madison Realty, nonparty-ap — Separate applications pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 60-day enlargement of time to perfect appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted to the extent that the applicants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 3, 2018, the joint record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ respective briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the applications are otherwise denied.Dominique Barnes, appellant-res, v. Garda, LLC, res-ap, Parsons QSR, LLC, doing business as Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., res — Application by the appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered August 29, 2016, and October 6, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant-respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 11, 2018, and the brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Michael A. Cohen, res, v. Idit Cohen, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 5, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Sofia A. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- appellant; Rubia A. (Anonymous), respondent- res — Appeal by Administration for Children’s Services from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated October 2, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 4, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.The Elizabeth Kurrus Special Needs Trust, et al., plf, v. Theresa McCord res, Victoria Starkey, nonparty- ap — Application by the nonparty-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 16, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,ORDERED that on the court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.MATTER of Estate of James Rivers, a/k/a James Vergus Rivers, deceased, by executor, Shimequa Goodman, plf-res, v. Shavora Singletary, ap, Northeast Lending Services, def-res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for an enlargement of time until Spring 2018 to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 29, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 25, 2018, the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Keia Wittingham, res, v. William H. Payne III, ap — Appeal by William H. Payne III from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated July 17, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 1, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the child in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.Eva Frangiamore, ap, v. Wayne Noel Drywall, Inc. res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 22, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 16, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Kwaku Quartey, ap, v. Latanya Genise Van Buren, res — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Latanya Genise Van Buren, res, v. Kwaku Quartey, ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeal by Kwaku Quartey from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 8, 2017. By order on certification of this Court dated October 31, 2017, the following attorney was assigned as counsel for the appellant on the appeal:Michael E. Lipson, Esq.366 North Broadway, Suite 410Jericho, New York 11753516-729-1701By letter dated December 3, 2017, the assigned counsel has informed this Court that the appellant wishes to proceed with the appeal. Pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), it isORDERED that the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings shall be perfected either within 60 days after the receipt by the assigned counsel of the transcripts of the minutes of the proceedings in the Family Court, and the assigned counsel shall notify this Court by letter of the date the transcripts are received, or, if there are no minutes of proceedings to be transcribed, within 60 days of the date of this  ; and it is further,ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this  , the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that the order of this Court dated October 31, 2017, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this  , the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.MATTER of Freeda Mary Scudder, ap, v. Rahul Scudder, res — V-10496-16) — Appeal by Freeda Mary Scudder from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated January 4, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4 [a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the appellant to serve and file a reply brief on the appeal is enlarged until December 22, 2017.Americore Drilling & Cutting, Inc., res, v. EMB Contracting Corp. ap — Application by the appellants pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 7, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Crossroads II, LLC, ap, v. Empire Wine & Liquor Superstore, LLC res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 26, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until February 20, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, et al., res, v. Roman Catholic Church of Saint Igantius, def, 1267 Rogers Avenue, LLC, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 3, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 31, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.Shameem Chowdhury, ap, v. Robert Thomas, res — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 22, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.MATTER of Nialani T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elizabeth B. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Aarielis G. T. (Anonymous). Administration for Childrens Services, petitioner- res, Elizabeth B. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2) — Appeals by Elizabeth B. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated March 28, 2016, and June 9, 2017, respectively. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the appellant’s time to perfect the appeals by causing the original papers constituting the record on the appeals to be filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.9[d][2]) and by serving and filing the appellant’s brief on the appeals is enlarged until January 18, 2018.MATTER of Michael Matthew Mendez, res, v. Lesly Limas, ap — Appeal by Lesly Limas from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated May 18, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that the time for the respondent to serve and file a brief on the appeal is enlarged until January 24, 2018.Lalynnza Cash, res, v. BFP Tower C Co., LLC res-ap, Otis Elevator Company, appellant-res — Application by the respondents-appellants BFP Tower C Co., LLC, and Brookfield Financial Properties, LP, and separate application by the respondents-appellants American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc., and American Express Company pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file their respective reply briefs on an appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 19, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the applications and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the applications are granted, the applicants’ time to serve and file their respective reply briefs is enlarged until December 26, 2017, and the reply briefs shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Balkin, JJ.MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Saul Fenchel, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of The Miness Family Trust Dated October 10, 1988. Francis W. Deegan, petitioner-res, Mark Miness objectants-ap — (Proceeding No. 2) (File Nos. 2012-369167/B, 2012-369167/A) — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the order on application of this Court dated December 1, 2017, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated January 24, 2017, is amended by deleting from the first paragraph thereof the words “Kings County,” and substituting therefor the words “Nassau County.”ENG, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ., concur.Diana Yang Chen res-ap, v. Wen Fang Wang, a/k/a Fanny Wang, appellant-respondent def — Application by the appellant-respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) for a 30-day enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 1, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted to the extent that the appellant-respondent’s time to serve and file a reply brief is enlarged until December 20, 2017, the reply brief shall be served and filed on or before that date, and the application is otherwise denied.MATTER of Cashmere T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Andrew S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 1)MATTER of Kashane R. S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Andrew S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 2)MATTER of Keyona R. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Andrew S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 3)MATTER of Kashawn A. S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner- res, Andrew S. (Anonymous), respondent- ap — (Proceeding No. 4) N-23402-15, N-23403-15) — Appeals by Andrew S. from two orders of the Family Court, Queens County, dated April 17, 2017, and May 30, 2017, respectively. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 4, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the briefs for the respondent and the attorney for the children in the above-entitled appeals shall be served and filed.MATTER of Ivan S. (Anonymous), ap, v. Monique M. (Anonymous), res — Appeal by Ivan S. from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 2017. The appellant’s brief was filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court on December 4, 2017. Pursuant to §670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]), it isORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order, the brief for the respondent in the above-entitled appeal shall be served and filed.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Zvi Katz, appellant plf, v. Mendy Blau res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 24, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 3, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Han Bin Hu, res, v. Bravo Food, Inc., appellant def — Motion by the appellant to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 9, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the trial in the above-entitled action is stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Linda Berkovits, res, v. Orlit Chaaya ap — Motion by the appellants to stay the trial in the above-entitled action pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 12, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Ruth Haas, ap, v. William Zev Haas, res — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, in effect, to direct the respondent to pay maintenance to her in the sum of $930 per month, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 27, 2017, and for poor person relief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Federal National Mortgage Association, res, v. Mordechai Mendlowitz, appellant def — Motion by the appellant, inter alia, to stay the foreclosure sale of the subject premises, pending hearing and determination of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 24, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.State of New York res, v. Ruth Winkle appellants def — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 26, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.US Bank, National Association, as trustee for CMLTI 2006-WF2, res, v. Daniel Swerdloff ap — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 20, 2016, and October 3, 2016, respectively.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeals is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeals and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stephen Mitchell, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 20, 2015.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Stephen Mitchell, ap — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 23, 2014.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until March 5, 2018, and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Jennifer Gurewitz res, v. City of New York defendants third-party plaintiffs-res-ap, Haks Group, Inc., defendant-appellant- res, Nasdi, LLC, third-party defendant-appellant-res — Motion by the defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents-appellants City of New York and New York City Department of Transportation to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on appeals and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated September 7, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the movants’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until December 22, 2017, and the movants’ brief, including the points of argument on their cross appeal (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.William Carriere, res, v. Joseph R. Carriere ap, Rosemary Carriere, def — Motion by the appellants to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 22, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellants’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.Bebi Z. Alli, ap, v. Bhojnarine Baijnath, et al., res — Motion by the appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Marisol Miranda ap, v. Leone Realty, Inc. res — Motion by the respondents to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondents’ time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the respondents’ brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.179 Court Street Holding Corp., res, v. 127-18 Liberty Avenue Corp., ap, et al., def — Motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 10, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Richmond Hill Music & Amusements Co., Inc., plf-ap, v. Rori Tricarico, defendant third-party plaintiff-res, Mitchell Kaufman, third-party defendant- ap — Motion by the plaintiff-appellant and the third-party defendant-appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 27, 2016.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted, the time of plaintiff-appellant and the third-party defendant-appellant to perfect the appeal is enlarged until January 9, 2018, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the brief of plaintiff-appellant and the third-party defendant-appellant shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.PEOPLE, etc., res, v. Victor N. Koltun, ap — Motion by the appellant for an expedited briefing schedule and a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered March 12, 2014. Cross motion by the respondent to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition and upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is thereto, it isORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for a preference is granted, and the appeal will be calendared expeditiously after all of the briefs have been filed; and it is further,ORDERED that the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the cross motion is granted, the respondent’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 8, 2018, and the respondent’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date; and it is further,ORDERED that no further enlargement of time shall be granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Andre Heino, deceased. Harvey Heino, petitioner-respondent-appellant; Jay Heino objectants-appellants-res — (File No. 4868/99) — Motion by the petitioner-respondent-appellant to strike stated portions of the joint appendix on appeals and a cross appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated January 25, 2017, on the ground that they contain matter dehors the record. Application by the petitioner-respondent-appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to serve and file a brief.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied; and it is further,ORDERED that the application is granted, the petitioner-respondent-appellant’s time to serve and file a brief is enlarged until February 8, 2018, and the petitioner-respondent-appellant’s answering brief, including the points of argument on the cross appeal, in accordance with the rules of this Court (see 22 NYCRR 670.8[c][3]), shall be served and filed on or before that date.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Michael J. M. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Nadia M. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant res — Appeal by Nadia M. from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated October 13, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law §384- b (see Family Ct Act §1112; Matter of Sheldon D. G., 6 AD3d 613; see also        Matter of Alyssa L. [Deborah K.], 93 AD3d 1083, 1084-1085), and leave to appeal has not been granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.MATTER of Stephanie M. Filiberto, ap, v. Christopher S. Walsh, res — Appeal by Stephanie M. Filiberto from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 2, 2017.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, part 3 (see Family Ct Act §1112), and leave to appeal has not been granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Chambers, J.P.; Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ.Shaindy Weichman, ap, v. Yecheskel C. Weichman, res — Appeal by Shaindy Weichman from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 30, 2016.On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies as of right from an order that is not the result of a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701), and leave to appeal has not been granted.CHAMBERS, J.P., HALL, SGROI and BARROS, JJ., concur.By Leventhal, J.P.; Hinds-Radix, Lasalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ.NMNT Realty Corp., ap, v. Knoxville 2012 Trust, res, et al, def — Motion by the appellant for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied.LEVENTHAL, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.By Rivera, J.P.; Austin, Connolly and Iannacci, JJ.MATTER of David Coleman, ap, v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision res — Motion by the appellant for a preference in the calendaring of an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 28, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is granted and the appeal will be calendared expeditiously.RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.By Balkin, J.P.; Hall, Hinds-Radix and Christopher, JJ.MATTER of Lakrista Q. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, petitioner-res, Samantha Q. (Anonymous), res-res — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 7, 2017, in the above-entitled matter is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:Motion by the respondent-appellant for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated July 7, 2017, as a poor person.Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition and in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the motion is denied with leave to renew, within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, upon proper papers setting forth the amount and source of fees paid to retained counsel; and it is further,ORDERED that pursuant to §670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the respondent-appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcript is expected; or(4) if the respondent-appellant is indigent and cannot afford to obtain the minutes or perfect the appeal, a motion in this Court, as set forth above, for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person; or(5) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5), above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of this Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.BALKIN, J.P., HALL, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.HSBC Bank, USA, etc., res, v. Vernon Willis, ap — Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 17, 2017.Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it isORDERED that the application is granted, the appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged until December 8, 2017, and the record or appendix on the appeal and the appellant’s brief shall be served and filed on or before that date.By Rivera, J.P.; Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ.Marash Gjelaj, res, v. Anisa Gjelaj, ap — On the Court’s own motion, it isORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 17, 2017, in the above-entitled matter, on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 26, 2017, is amended by deleting from the sixth decretal paragraph thereof the words “Kings County” and substituting therefor the words “Westchester County.”RIVERA, J.P., HALL, COHEN and MILLER, JJ., concur.