X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

DECISION AND ORDER

*1 Having reviewed the record herein, including, without limitation: (1) the defense letter, dated December 20, 2017 (“Defense Letter”), seeking a mistrial based upon an unanswered question asked of the Defendant, Mehmet Hakan Atilla, by an Assistant United States Attorney during cross-examination, Defense Letter at 1; and (2) the government letter, dated December 20, 2017 (“Government Letter”), opposing the motion, Government Letter at 1; and having reviewed the relevant legal authorities, the Court respectfully denies the defense application.1The question posed by this motion is whether a single unanswered question on cross-examination which was itself stricken from the record by the Court after the Court directed the witness not to answer results in a mistrial. See 12/19/17 Tr. at 2208:20-21, 2223:8-11. While that may be an appropriate outcome in some cases, under the circumstances presented here a mistrial is manifestly inappropriate and unnecessary, as follows:1. “[A] trial court should avoid granting a mistrial whenever possible, unless there is a clear manifest necessity.” Rink v. United States, 388 A.2d 52, 58 n.9. (D.C. 1978); see also 23A C.J.S. Criminal Procedure and Rights of Accused §1932 (“A mistrial is a severe, dramatic, extreme, and drastic remedy to be employed only in limited, extreme, and rare circumstances. A mistrial is not favored and is required only when there is a manifest necessity for a mistrial, or manifest

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More
May 15, 2024
Philadelphia, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.


Learn More

Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...


Apply Now ›

Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris seeks an associate with 3-4 years of experience to join its Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group in its Philadelp...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›