A woman’s legal malpractice case against a personal injury firm should go forward after the firm’s expert failed to address the basis of the woman’s claim and ignored her testimony at trial, a state appeals court ruled Tuesday.
A panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a 2016 denial of Greenstein & Milbauer’s summary judgment motion, saying it failed to meet its prima facie burden.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
