Recent U.S. Supreme Court Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, including this year’s decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), holds that except in rare cases a life sentence without parole for a crime committed by a juvenile is disproportionate punishment in violation of the cruel and unusual punishment clause. In accordance with these cases, persons sentenced to life as juveniles now must be provided a “meaningful opportunity” for release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation.
These recent cases require New York state to re-evaluate its parole law, regulations, and practices for four reasons: (1) New York is one of only two states that automatically prosecutes teenagers 16 and up as adults; (2) children as young as 13 convicted of murder are automatically sentenced to life in prison with opportunity for parole; (3) the New York Board of Parole does not currently focus its parole release decision-making on whether or not offenders have been reformed and are safe to release, i.e., their “maturity and rehabilitation”; and (4) the New York parole scheme does not currently afford procedural protections to ensure that the Board of Parole provides persons serving life sentences for crimes committed as juveniles a meaningful opportunity for release.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
