The two children of a tobacco heiress and her estranged husband would not be “revictimized” by keeping the courtroom open for oral arguments on the father’s request to lift a ban on the children meeting his girlfriend, a Brooklyn judge ruled.

According to court papers, the husband in the case, identified in media reports and the Office of Court Administration’s website as Crocker Coulson, moved in April to lift a “no paramour rule” barring the parties’ children from being in the presence of Coulson’s girlfriend, who is pregnant with their child.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]