In refusing to dismiss a legal malpractice suit against Liddle & Robinson and its founding partner, a judge found a jury should decide whether the firm's approach to negotiating a higher severance, which ultimately led to no severance, was reasonable.
April 22, 2016 at 09:00 AM
1 minute read
In refusing to dismiss a legal malpractice suit against Liddle & Robinson and its founding partner, a judge found a jury should decide whether the firm’s approach to negotiating a higher severance, which ultimately led to no severance, was reasonable.
However, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice George Silver dismissed claims for gross negligence and punitive damages.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Seeking a compassionate and experienced estate administration attorney for growing boutique estate planning and elder law practice. Huge eq...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
