A Commercial Division judge has rejected most of the summary judgment arguments made by owners of Palm, a famed Manhattan steakhouse, and ruled the dispute between descendants of the restaurant’s two founders can go to trial.
Justice Jeffrey Oing said in a Feb. 11 ruling that the grandchildren of one of the founders can proceed with their suit against their cousin and the other founder’s grandson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
