As a testifying expert, my name is mentioned in “Rulings on Gatekeeping of Expert Testimony,” by Michael Hoenig (Nov. 20, 2013). The article involved the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit opinion in Dash v. Mayweather, 731 F.3d 303 (4th Cir. Sept. 26, 2013).
The district court and circuit opinions on this matter involved a motion for summary judgment to dismiss a case brought by plaintiff, Anthony Dash, who failed to meet the fully evidentiary requirements needed to prove one example of prior licensing activity. As I learned from PACER records after the opinion came down, Dash was apparently unable to present the requisite sworn materials because he had not declared them on his income tax forms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
