A woman can proceed with her suit claiming employment discrimination on religious grounds after a judge ruled there were factual questions about whether her purported employer was a religious organization in the eyes of anti-discrimination laws.

Eastern District Judge Roslynn Mauskopf said she could not decide on the record before her if All Girls Allowed—a non-profit fighting China’s one-child policy among other things—qualified for the New York City Human Rights Law’s exemption allowing religious organizations to limit employment or give preference to co-religionists.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]