Likening production of a custody evaluator's notes to prosecutors' disclosure obligations in criminal cases, a Long Island judge has ruled that a divorcing husband's expert was entitled to review all the raw information generated by the court-appointed evaluator, and said that, with certain ground rules, the parties themselves could read the evaluator's report and raw materials.
October 27, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Editors’ Note: This article has been updated to reflect a Clarification.
Grappling with the issue of how much information lawyers and their clients can access from child custody forensic investigations, a Long Island judge has ruled that a divorcing husband’s expert was entitled to review all the raw information generated by the court-appointed evaluator.
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
