North Korea’s removal from a list of state sponsors of terrorism has led a federal appeals court to sustain a judge’s refusal to allow the attachment of $378 million in funds recovered in a default judgment against that country in a case over arming terrorists.

Handing a victory to banks that were holding electronic fund transfers frozen in place pursuant to sanctions against North Korea, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said North Korea was not a “terrorist party” within the meaning of §201 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA) at the time the judgment was obtained.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]