Though a recent ruling from the state’s high court deemed a harassment statute unconstitutionally vague, a defendant in a separate case could not convince a judge to apply the holding retroactively as a way to trim the charges against him.
In August 2011, Larkin Ellis pleaded guilty to second-degree aggravated harassment, pursuant to Penal Law §240.30(1)(a), and was required to abide by a five-year order of protection directing him to stay away from his mother-in-law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
