ALBANY – Several state Court of Appeals judges suggested Tuesday during arguments in two rural upstate zoning cases that their rulings could have a wide-ranging effect on the future of the natural gas drilling technique known as “fracking” in New York and on state energy policies in general.

Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman (See Profile) closed more than an hour of arguments in Matter of Wallach v. Town of Dryden, 130, and Cooperstown Holstein Corporation v. Town of Middlefield, 131, by observing that while having adequate energy supplies is an important public policy consideration, so is the need not to “bulldoze” opinions of residents in communities opposed to hydraulic fracturing.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]